🔗 Share this article

Among some of the most famous images of the 20th century portrays an unclothed young girl, her hands outstretched, her face distorted in agony, her flesh blistered and peeling. She is dashing toward the photographer after running from an airstrike during the Vietnam War. To her side, other children also run away from the bombed hamlet of the area, against a scene of black clouds and military personnel.

The Global Effect from an Powerful Photograph

Just after its publication in the early 1970s, this photograph—originally titled "The Terror of War"—turned into an analog sensation. Seen and analyzed by millions, it's generally hailed for energizing worldwide views against the US war in Southeast Asia. One noted critic subsequently commented how the deeply lasting picture featuring the child the girl suffering probably did more to increase public revulsion toward the conflict than a hundred hours of televised atrocities. A legendary English photojournalist who covered the fighting called it the ultimate image of the so-called “The Television War”. A different veteran photojournalist stated that the image represents simply put, one of the most important photographs ever made, particularly from that conflict.

A Long-Held Claim and a Modern Allegation

For over five decades, the photo was assigned to the work of Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, a then-21-year-old local photojournalist on assignment for a major news agency at the time. However a controversial latest documentary streaming on a popular platform claims that the well-known photograph—often hailed as the apex of photojournalism—was actually shot by someone else present that day in the village.

According to the film, "Napalm Girl" was actually photographed by a stringer, who provided his photos to the AP. The claim, along with the documentary's following investigation, originates with an individual called an ex-staffer, who states how the influential bureau head instructed the staff to change the photograph's attribution from the original photographer to Nick Út, the one AP staff photographer present during the incident.

The Investigation to find the Real Story

The former editor, currently elderly, contacted an investigator in 2022, requesting help to locate the unknown cameraman. He stated that, if he was still living, he wanted to give a regret. The filmmaker reflected on the unsupported photojournalists he knew—comparing them to current independents, similar to local photographers during the war, are frequently ignored. Their work is often doubted, and they work in far tougher circumstances. They are not insured, they don’t have pensions, minimal assistance, they usually are without good equipment, making them highly exposed as they capture images in their own communities.

The filmmaker asked: “What must it feel like to be the individual who made this image, should it be true that he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he imagined, it would be deeply distressing. As a follower of photojournalism, specifically the vaunted combat images of Vietnam, it could prove groundbreaking, possibly career-damaging. The hallowed legacy of the image in the community meant that the director whose parents emigrated during the war was hesitant to take on the film. He said, I hesitated to challenge the accepted account that credited Nick the photograph. Nor did I wish to disrupt the current understanding among a group that had long looked up to this success.”

This Inquiry Develops

However both the filmmaker and the creator concluded: it was worth posing the inquiry. “If journalists must keep the world accountable,” noted the journalist, “we have to be able to ask difficult questions of ourselves.”

The film tracks the journalists as they pursue their inquiry, from testimonies from observers, to call-outs in modern Saigon, to archival research from related materials taken that day. Their work lead to a name: a driver, employed by a news network at the time who occasionally provided images to foreign agencies independently. According to the documentary, a moved Nghệ, like others in his 80s based in California, states that he provided the image to the AP for minimal payment and a print, but was troubled by not being acknowledged for decades.

This Backlash and Further Analysis

He is portrayed in the footage, reserved and thoughtful, however, his claim proved controversial in the world of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to