🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."